Social consequences of counternormative behavior The Violation Appraisal Response (VAR) model
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2026 |
| Journal | Advances in Experimental Social Psychology |
| Volume | Issue number | 74 |
| Pages (from-to) | 105-199 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Human behavior is guided by social norms – for better or worse. Yet, norm violations are widespread, from fraud and sexual harassment to civil disobedience and obstructive protest. Observers’ responses to norm violations play a critical role in discouraging or encouraging counternormative behavior, ultimately shaping the evolution of normative systems. However, these responses and their downstream consequences are poorly understood. Here, we review empirical research on behavioral responses to norm violations across academic disciplines (e.g., psychology, behavioral economics, management science, empirical aesthetics). This review highlights substantial variability in responses, ranging from opposition to acquiescence to support. Building on these insights, we develop the Violation Appraisal Response (VAR) model, which illuminates how observers’ subjective interpretations of norm violations shape different emotional reactions that fuel divergent behavioral responses. Specifically, we propose that the perceived disruptiveness of violations elicits condemnatory emotions (anger, disgust, contempt), which drive oppositional responses (confrontation, punishment, social exclusion, gossip, whistleblowing) that serve to sustain norms; perceived threat elicits apprehensive emotions (fear, anxiety), which drive acquiescent responses (tolerance, avoidance) that allow for norm erosion; and perceived benefit elicits appreciative emotions (admiration, gratitude, elevation, awe), which drive supportive responses (endorsement, emulation) that promote norm change. We discuss theoretical moderators of perceived disruptiveness, threat, and benefit, describe intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of associated emotional reactions, and outline consequences for norm development. Finally, we consider implications of our review and model and present a research agenda to establish when and how norm violations spread or are contained and when norms erode versus persist.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2026.03.002
(Final published version)
|
| Other links | |
| Permalink to this page | |
