Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 27
Number of items: 27
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2022). [Review of: M. Müller (2021) Grammatik des Bohairischen]. Lingua Aegyptia, 30, 317–320. https://doi.org/10.37011/lingaeg.30.14
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2021). [Review of: J.-L. Fournet (2020) The Rise of Coptic: Egyptian Versus Greek in Late Antiquity]. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 141, 316. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075426921000835
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2020). The Alexandria polyphony: The voices in the Bohairic Acts of the Martyrs. In G. Gabra, & H. N. Takla (Eds.), Christianity and monasticism in Alexandria and the Egyptian deserts (pp. 205-222). (Christianity and monasticism series), (Christianity and monasticism in Egypt; Vol. 8). American University in Cairo Press.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2017). Complex verbs in Bohairic Coptic: Language contact and valency . In B. Nolan, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Argument realisation in complex predicates and complex events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface (pp. 213-243). (Studies in language companion series (SLCS)). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.180.08zak
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2017). The Bohairic Acts of the Martyrs as a genre of religious discourse. In G. Ǧabra, & H. N. Takla (Eds.), Christianity and monasticism in northern Egypt: Beni Suef, Giza, Cairo, and the Nile Delta (pp. 223-238). (Christianity and monasticism in Egypt ; Vol. 7 ). American University in Cairo Press.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2017). Objects and Topics. In N. Bosson, A. Boud’hors , & S. H. Aufrère (Eds.), Labor omnia uicit improbus: Miscellanea in honorem Ariel Shisha-Halevy (pp. 381-407 ). (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta ; Vol. 256). Peeters.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2017). 'A bilingual language variety' or 'the language of the pharaohs'? Coptic from the perspective of contact linguistics . In E. Grossman, P. Dils, T. S. Richter , & W. Schenkel (Eds.), Greek Influence on Egyptian-Coptic : Contact-induced change in an ancient African language (pp. 115–161 ). (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica ; Vol. 17). Widmaier Verlag.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2016). Why did Egyptians write Coptic? The rise of Coptic as a literary language. In L. Mahmoud , & A. Mansour (Eds.), Copts in the Egyptian society before and after the Muslim conquest : archaeological, historical and applied studies. - 2: papers in English and French at the First International Coptic Studies Conference Life in Egypt during the Coptic Period "Towns and Villages, Laymen and Clergy, Bishops and Dioceses", Bibliotheca Alexandrina Center for Calligraphy Studies, 21-23 September 2010 (pp. 211-219 ). (Studies in calligraphy and writings; Vol. 19). Bibliotheca Alexandrina.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2016). Coptic linguistics 2004-2008: Synthesis and perspectives. In P. Buzi, A. Camplani, & F. Contardi (Eds.), Coptic society, literature and religion from late Antiquity to modern times: Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Coptic Studies, Rome, September 17th-22th, 2012 and plenary reports of the Ninth International Congress of Coptic Studies, Cairo, September 15th-19th, 2008 (pp. 227-258). (Orientalia Lovaniensia analecta ; Vol. 247). Peeters.
  • Zakrzewska, E. D. (2015). GIVE and its arguments in Bohairic Coptic. In B. Nolan, G. Rawoens, & E. Diedrichsen (Eds.), Causation, permission, and transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs (pp. 227-252). (Studies in language companion series; No. 167). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.167.08zak
Page 1 of 3