Search results
Results: 99
Number of items: 99
-
De Kwaadsteniet, E. W., Homan, A. C., Van Dijk, E., & Van Beest, I. (2012). Social information as a cue for tacit coordination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211410235
-
Spisak, B. R., Homan, A. C., Grabo, A., & Van Vugt, M. (2012). Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.08.006
-
Janz, K., Buengeler, C., Eckhoff, R. A., Homan, A. C., & Voelpel, S. C. (2012). Leveraging age diversity in times of demographic change: the crucial role of leadership. In C. L. Scott, & M. Y. Byrd (Eds.), Handbook of research on workforce diversity in a global society: technologies and concepts (pp. 163-184). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-1812-1.ch010
-
van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Finkenauer, C., Blaker, N. M., & Heerdink, M. W. (2012). Prosocial norm violations fuel power affordance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 937-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.022 -
Van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., & Cheshin, A. (2012). Emotional Influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 311-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386612454911 -
van Knippenberg, D., Dawson, J. F., West, M. A., & Homan, A. C. (2011). Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance. Human Relations, 64(3), 307-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710378384
-
van Kleef, G. A., Homan, A. C., Finkenauer, C., Gündemir, S., & Stamkou, E. (2011). Breaking the rules to rise to power: how norm violators gain power in the eyes of others. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(5), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611398416 -
Steinel, W., van Kleef, G. A., van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M. A., Homan, A. C., & Moffit, G. (2010). How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: the role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 779-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210375702
Page 9 of 10