Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 147
Number of items: 147
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). Strategic maneuvering with the intention of the legislator in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, 22(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9100-4
  • Feteris, E. T. (2008). The rational reconstruction of weighing and balancing on the basis of teleological-evaluative considerations in the justification of judicial decisions. Ratio Juris, 21(4), 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2008.00402.x
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2008). The pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of teleological argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, 22(4), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9083-1
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2008). Weighing and balancing in the justification of judicial decisions. Informal logic, 28(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i1.511
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2008). Models for the analysis of legal argumentation: introduction. Informal logic, 28(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v28i1.509
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2008). A normative reconstruction of arguments from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. Dubrovskaya, & Y. V. Kitayeva (Eds.), Modern developments in linguistics and language teaching: II international conference proceedings, Moscow-Penza, 28-30 april 2008 = Sovremennye napravlenija v lingvistike i prepodavanii jazykov: materialy II meždunarodnoj naučno-praktičeskoj konferencii, Moskva-Penza, 28-30 aprelja 2008 (pp. 86-96). MNEPU.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2007). The pragma-dialectical reconstruction of teleological-evaluative argumentation in complex structures of legal justification. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007 Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA7/papersandcommentaries/39/
  • Pontier, J. A., Feteris, E. T., Kloosterhuis, H., & Plug, H. J. (Eds.) (2007). 'Alles afwegende....' : bijdragen aan het Vijfde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 22 juni 2007 te Rotterdam. Ars Aequi Libri.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Complexe argumentatie op basis van doelen en gevolgen bij de toepassing van rechtsregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(1), 15-25.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2006). Arguments from unacceptable consequences in the justification of judicial opinions. In C. Dahlman, & W. Krawietz (Eds.), Values, rights and duties in legal and philosophical discourse. (pp. 225-237). (Rechtstheorie, Beiheft; No. 21).
Page 7 of 15