Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 147
Number of items: 147
  • Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H. J., & Smith, C. (Eds.) (2024). Legal Argumentation: Reasoned Dissensus and Common Ground. Boom. https://www.boomportaal.nl/boek/9789462129214
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H. J., & Smith, C. (2024). Introduction. In E. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, & C. Smith (Eds.), Legal Argumentation: Reasoned Dissensus and Common Ground (pp. ix-xiv). Boom.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2021). The pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation as specific form of rational discussion. In M. Sellers, & S. Kirste (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (Living ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_813-1
  • Feteris, E. T., Kloosterhuis, H., & Plug, H. J. (2021). Uses of Linguistic Argumentation in the Justification of Legal Decisions. In R. Boogaart, H. Jansen, & M. van Leeuwen (Eds.), The Language of Argumentation (pp. 127-142). (Argumentation Library; Vol. 36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9_7
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. (2020). The visual rhetoric of iconic photographs as topoi in editorial cartoons: an argumentative analysis. In C. Dutilh Novaes, H. Jansen, J. A. van Laar, & B. Verheij (Eds.), Reason to Dissent: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. II, pp. 287-301). (Studies in Logic. Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 86). College Publications. https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00013
  • Feteris, E. T. (2019). Hukuki Argümantasyonun Temelleri: Yargı Kararlarını Gerekçelendirme Teorileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Pinhan Yayıncılık.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2019). The reconstruction of visual argumentation in editorial cartoons with a visual metaphor. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 370-378). Sic Sat. https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
  • Feteris, E. T. (2018). The development of prototypical patterns of weighing and balancing in the justification of judicial decisions. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 2, pp. 313-326). (Studies in logic; Vol. 77). College Publications.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2018). Fa lü lun bian dao lun = Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Si fa cai jue bian hu li lun zhi gai lan. (Xi fang fa lü luo ji jing dian yi cong). Zhong guo zheng fa da xue chu ban she.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2017). Fundamentals of legal argumentation: A survey of theories on the justification of legal decisions. (2nd ed.) (Argumentation Library; Vol. 1). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4
Page 1 of 15