Search results
-
Full text
-
Document type
-
Organisation
Filter results
Results: 214,774
Number of items: 214,774
-
Cinà, G., Röber, T. E., Goedhart, R., & Birbil, Ş. İ. (2025). Why we do need explainable AI for healthcare. Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 9, Article 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-025-00209-4 -
Paijmans, M., & Fatah-Black, K. (Eds.) (2025). Slavery in the Cultural Imagination: Debates, Silence, and Dissent in the Neerlandophone Space. (Slavery and Emancipation). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.27894338, https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463728799 -
Boss, S., & Bodó, B. (2025). Censorship-Resistance and Compliance Behavior in the Ethereum Consensus Mechanism. In 2025 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC 2025): Pisa, Italy, 2-6 June 2025 (pp. 109-113). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC64466.2025.11114701 -
Tulin, M., Hameleers, M., de Vreese, C., Opgenhaffen, M., & Wouters, F. (2025). Beyond Belief Correction: Effects of the Truth Sandwich on Perceptions of Fact-checkers and Verification Intentions. Journalism Practice, 19(11), 2576-2595. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2311311 -
Cetinić, M. (2025). Abstraction in Melancholia. Soapbox Journal for Cultural Analysis, 6(0), 77-103. https://www.soapboxjournal.net/print-editions/6-0-on-the-uses-of-absence -
Fermeglia, M., & Setzer, J. (2025). Investment disputes: supporting and undermining climate action. In B. Martinez Romera, L. Nordlander, A. Monti, & J. E. Ritter (Eds.), Human Rights and Investment Law for Climate Change (pp. 87-106). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035310098.00013 -
Watkins, M., Puggaard-Rode, R., Boersma, P., & Hamann, S. (2025). Robustness of F0 ratio as a diagnostic: comparing creaky voice in Danish and Seoul Korean. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH, 26, 4203-4207. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2025-1949 -
Heseltine, M., & Clemm von Hohenberg, B. (2025). Large language models as a substitute for human experts in annotating political text. Research and Politics, 11, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680241236239
Page 429 of 21478