Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 77
Number of items: 77
  • Open Access
    Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J., & Reed, C. (2018). Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (pp. 313-324). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2017). Quels critères pour déterminer la "meilleure" explication scientifique? Tranel, 65, 79-88. http://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/tranel/files/Tranel/65/79-88_Wagemans_def.pdf
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Criteria for deciding what is the ’best’ scientific explanation. In D. Mohammed, & M. Lewiński (Eds.), Argumentation and Reasoned Action: proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation, Lisbon 2015 (Vol. 2, pp. 43-54). (Studies in Logic; Vol. 63). College Publications. https://www.academia.edu/24361368/Criteria_for_deciding_what_is_the_best_scientific_explanation
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Rhetorical Status Theory as an Institutional Framework for Legal Discussions. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Legal argumentation and the rule of law (pp. 205-215). Eleven International Publishing.
  • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Redelijkheid in context: de rol van institutionele conventies in de pragma-dialectische beoordeling van argumentatie. In D. Van De Mieroop, L. Buysse, R. Coesemans, & P. Gillaerts (Eds.), De macht van de taal: taalbeheersingsonderzoek in Nederland en Vlaanderen (pp. 245-256). Acco.
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Reply to commentary on Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. In L. Benacquista, & P. Bondy (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 11, University of Windsor, May 18-21, 2016 OSSA. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/163/
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. In L. Benacquista, & P. Bondy (Eds.), Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 11, University of Windsor, May 18-21, 2016 OSSA. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/106/
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Analyzing metaphor in argumentative discourse. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, 10(2), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.4396/20161207
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2016). Argumentative Patterns for Justifying Scientific Explanations. Argumentation, 30(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9374-2
  • Open Access
    Popa, E. O. (2016). Thought experiments in academic communication: A pragma-dialectical method for reconstructing the argumentative use of imaginary scenarios in academic disputes. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
Page 5 of 8