Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 79
Number of items: 79
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2026). Breaking Plato’s Spell: Reimagining Rhetoric and Dialectic as Counterparts of Hermeneutics. Topoi, 45(3), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-025-10328-8
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2025). Periodic Table of Arguments 3.0. Web publication or website, Periodic Table of Arguments. https://periodic-table-of-arguments.org/
  • Open Access
    Hinton, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2025). Two-Tier Fallacy Theory: A New Approach to Assessing Argument Quality. Informal logic, 45(4), 472-503. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v45i4.9435
  • Open Access
    Goossens, F., Plug, H. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric Approach. In J. Savelka, J. Harasta, T. Novotna, & J. Misek (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2024: The Thirty-seventh Annual Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, 11-13 December 2024 (pp. 288-294). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 395). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA241257
  • Open Access
    Zenker, F., van Laar, J. A., Cepollaro, B., Gâţă, A., Hinton, M., King, C. G., Larson, B., Lewiński, M., Lumer, C., Oswald, S., Pichlak, M., Scott, B. D., Urbański, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation. Argumentation, 38(1), 7-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09598-6
  • Open Access
    Plug, H. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Argument-checken als een methode voor het identificeren van misinformatie. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 46(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2023.01.004.PLUG
  • Open Access
    Russo, F., Schliesser, E., & Wagemans, J. (2024). Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI. AI & Society, 39(4), 1585–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01617-6
  • Open Access
    Akkermans, A., Prins, S., Spijkers, A. S., Wagemans, J., Labrie, N. H. M., Willems, D. L., Schultz, M. J., Cherpanath, T. G. V., van Woensel, J. B. M., van Heerde, M., van Kaam, A. H., van de Loo, M., Stiggelbout, A., Smets, E. M. A., & de Vos, M. A. (2023). Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine, 49(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07027-6
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023). How to identify an argument type? On the hermeneutics of persuasive discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 203, 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.11.015
  • Open Access
    Benini, M., Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023). The logic of the arguer. Representing natural argumentative discourse in Adpositional Argumentation. The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 10(3), 451-483. https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/ifcolog/?00059
Page 1 of 8