Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 77
Number of items: 77
  • Open Access
    Hinton, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2025). Two-Tier Fallacy Theory: A New Approach to Assessing Argument Quality. Informal logic, 45(4), 472-503. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v45i4.9435
  • Open Access
    Goossens, F., Plug, H. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Annotating Legal Argument Schemes: A Parametric Approach. In J. Savelka, J. Harasta, T. Novotna, & J. Misek (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2024: The Thirty-seventh Annual Conference, Brno, Czech Republic, 11-13 December 2024 (pp. 288-294). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 395). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA241257
  • Open Access
    Plug, H. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Argument-checken als een methode voor het identificeren van misinformatie. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 46(1), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2023.01.004.PLUG
  • Open Access
    Russo, F., Schliesser, E., & Wagemans, J. (2024). Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI. AI & Society, 39(4), 1585–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01617-6
  • Open Access
    Zenker, F., van Laar, J. A., Cepollaro, B., Gâţă, A., Hinton, M., King, C. G., Larson, B., Lewiński, M., Lumer, C., Oswald, S., Pichlak, M., Scott, B. D., Urbański, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2024). Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation. Argumentation, 38(1), 7-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-023-09598-6
  • Open Access
    Gobbo, F., Benini, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023). More than Relata Refero: Representing the Various Roles of Reported Speech in Argumentative Discourse. In S. Oswald (Ed.), Pragmatics and Argumentation (pp. 45-55). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-8913-8, https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7010059
  • Open Access
    van Berkel, K., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023). Practical Reasoning and Practical Argumentation: A Stakeholder Commitment Approach. Topoi, 42(2), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09901-w
  • Open Access
    Akkermans, A., Prins, S., Spijkers, A. S., Wagemans, J., Labrie, N. H. M., Willems, D. L., Schultz, M. J., Cherpanath, T. G. V., van Woensel, J. B. M., van Heerde, M., van Kaam, A. H., van de Loo, M., Stiggelbout, A., Smets, E. M. A., & de Vos, M. A. (2023). Argumentation in end-of-life conversations with families in Dutch intensive care units: a qualitative observational study. Intensive Care Medicine, 49(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07027-6
  • Open Access
    Brave , R., Russo, F., Uzovic, O., & Wagemans, J. (2023). Can an AI Analyze Arguments? Argument-Checking and the Challenges of Assessing the Quality of Online Information. In C. El Morr (Ed.), AI and Society: Tensions and Opportunities (pp. 267-281). (Chapman & Hall/CRC Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Series). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003261247-20
  • Open Access
    Benini, M., Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2023). The logic of the arguer. Representing natural argumentative discourse in Adpositional Argumentation. The IfCoLog Journal of Logics and their Applications, 10(3), 451-483. https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/ifcolog/?00059
Page 1 of 8