Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 77
Number of items: 77
  • Open Access
    Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg): A new method for representing linguistic and pragmatic information about argumentative discourse. In S. Doutre, & T. de Lima (Eds.), JIAF: Journées d’Intelligence Artificielle Fondamentale : PFIA 2019 (pp. 101-107). Association française pour l'Intelligence Artificielle. https://www.irit.fr/pfia2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/actes_JIAF_CH_PFIA2019.pdf
  • Open Access
    Gobbo, F., Benini, M., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Annotation with adpositional argumentation: Guidelines for building a Gold Standard Corpus of argumentative discourse. Intelligenza Artificiale, 13(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.3233/IA-190028
  • Open Access
    Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). A method for reconstructing first-order arguments in natural language. In P. Dondio, & L. Longo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Advances In Argumentation In Artificial Intelligence, co-located with XVII International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 2018): 20-23 November 2018, Trento, Italy (pp. 27-41). (CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Vol. 2296). CEUR-WS. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2296/AI3-2018_paper_4.pdf
  • Open Access
    Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Building argumentative adpositional trees: Towards a high-precision method for reconstructing arguments in natural language. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 408-420). Sic Sat. https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). Four basic argument forms. Research in Language, 17(1), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2019-0005
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Assertoric syllogistic and the Periodic Table of Arguments. In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. I, pp. 573-588). (Studies in logic; Vol. 76). College Publications.
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Argumentation Based on Conduction: Commentary on Blair's In Defence of Conduction: Two Neglected Features of Argumentation . In S. Oswald, & D. Maillat (Eds.), Argumentation and Inference: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. 1, pp. 45-50). (Studies in logic; Vol. 76). College Publications. https://www.academia.edu/41700761/Argumentation_based_on_conduction
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Commentary on: “The potential of argumentation theory in enhancing patient-centered care in breaking bad news encounters”. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 7(2), 138-140. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18033.wag
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2018). Analogy, similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0028
  • Open Access
    Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J., & Reed, C. (2018). Revisiting computational models of argument schemes: Classification, annotation, comparison. In S. Modgil, K. Budzynska, & J. Lawrence (Eds.), Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018 (pp. 313-324). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 305). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-313
Page 4 of 8