Search results
Results: 79
Number of items: 79
-
Popa, E. O., & Wagemans, J. (2021). Stock issues and the structure of argumentative discussions: An integrative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.021 -
Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Reed, C., Wagemans, J., & Walton, D. (2021). Annotating Argument Schemes. Argumentation, 35(1), 101-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09519-x
-
Plug, H. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). From fact-checking to rhetoric-checking: extending methods for evaluating populist discourse. In I. van der Geest, H. Jansen, & B. van Klink (Eds.), Vox populi: Populism as a rhetorical and democratic challenge (pp. 236-252). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901412.00023
-
Gobbo, F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). Representing second-order arguments with Adpositional Argumentation (AdArg). In C. Dutilh Novaes, H. Jansen, J. A. van Laar , & B. Verheij (Eds.), Reason to Dissent: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation (Vol. II, pp. 315-326). (Studies in Logic. Logic and Argumentation; Vol. 86). College Publications. https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00013
-
Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). Why missing premises can be missed: Evaluating arguments by determining their ‘lever’. In J. Cook (Ed.), Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity: proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020) OSSA. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Saturday/1
-
Wagemans, J. H. M. (2020). Institutionalized argumentative reasonableness: Commentary on Menno Reijven’s “Institutional and Institutionalized Fallacies: Diversifying Pragma-Dialectical Fallacy Judgments”. In J. Cook (Ed.), OSSA 12: Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity (Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference; Vol. 12). OSSA. https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Wednesday/37/
-
Garssen, B., Godden, D., Mitchell, G. R., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (Eds.) (2019). Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation. Sic Sat. https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
-
Finsen, A. B., Steen, G. J., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). An argumentative reconstruction of the computer metaphor of the brain. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(3), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.18019.fin
-
Visser, J., Lawrence, J., Wagemans, J. H. M., & Reed, C. (2019). An annotated corpus of argument schemes in US election debates. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1101-1111). Sic Sat. https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
-
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2019). A pragma-dialectical reconstruction of medical Shared Decision-Making (SDM). In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. R. Mitchell, & J. H. M. Wagemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1074-1082). Sic Sat. https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
Page 3 of 8