Search results

    Filter results

  • Full text

  • Document type

  • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 147
Number of items: 147
  • Feteris, E. T. (2000). A dialogical theory of legal discussions: pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legal argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 8(2-3), 115-135.
  • Feteris, E. T. (1999). What went wrong in the ball-point case? An argumentative analysis and evaluation of the discussion in het ball-point case. In J. F. Nijboer, & M. Malsch (Eds.), Complex cases: perspectives on the Netherlands Criminal Justice System (pp. 159-178). Thela Thesis.
  • Feteris, E. T., Grootendorst, R., & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Bibliography of argumentation studies for 1997. Argumentation, 13(2), 221-232.
  • Feteris, E. T., Grootendorst, R., & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Bibliografie "argumentatietheorie" 1998. Taalbeheersing, 21(3), 220-229.
  • Feteris, E. T. (1999). Rationality in legal argumentation. A critical survey of theories on the justification of legal decisions. Kluwer.
  • Feteris, E. T. (1999). What went wrong in the ball-point case? An analysis and evaluation of the discussion in the ball-point case from the perspective of a rational discussion. In R. Grootendorst, F. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 188-194). SicSat.
  • Feteris, E. T. (1998). Wat ging er mis in de balpenzaak? Een analyse en beoordeling vanuit het perspectief van een redelijke discussie. Taalbeheersing, 20(4), 304-319.
  • Feteris, E. T. (1998). The soundness of 'pragmatic' or 'consequentialist' argumentation: does the end justify the means? In C. Tindale, & H. Hansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the OSSA conference on argumentation and rhetoric
  • Feteris, E. T., Grootendorst, R., & Houtlosser, P. (1998). Bibliografie "argumentatietheorie 1996". Taalbeheersing, 20(1), 55-69.
  • Feteris, E. T., Grootendorst, R., & Houtlosser, P. (1998). Bibliografie "argumentatietheorie" 1997. Taalbeheersing, 20(4), 331-343.
Page 11 of 15