Why missing premises can be missed: Evaluating arguments by determining their ‘lever’
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2020 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity: proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 12 (2020) |
| Event | OSSA 12: Evidence, Persuasion & Diversity |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Publisher | Windsor: OSSA |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | Traditional conceptualizations of argument usually include a ‘connecting premise’ or ‘warrant’ that needs to be added by the analyst when missing from the original discourse. This paper provides an alternative to adding such missing premises from a list of predefined argument schemes by using the framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments (PTA). It describes the Argument Type Identification Procedure (ATIP) and explains how to derive the so-called ‘lever’ of an argument from its identification. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA12/Saturday/1 |
| Downloads |
Why missing premises can be missed_ Evaluating arguments by deter
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
