Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2017 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Prototypical Argumentative Patterns |
| Book subtitle | Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Argumentation in Context |
| Pages (from-to) | 125-138 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In this contribution I identify prototypical patterns of symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. From a pragma-dialectical perspective, I explain the nature and rationale for the argumentative patterns from the perspective of the institutional function of legal justification and I distinguish different argumentative patterns in clear cases and hard cases in the justification of judicial decisions. |
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.08fet
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |