| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2019
|
| Host editors |
-
B. Garssen
-
D. Godden
-
G.R. Mitchell
-
J.H.M. Wagemans
|
| Book title |
Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Event |
Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA)
|
| Pages (from-to) |
1074-1082
|
| Number of pages |
9
|
| Publisher |
Amsterdam: Sic Sat
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
|
| Abstract |
In this paper we approach medical Shared Decision-Making (SDM) from the perspective of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. We develop an analytical tool for reconstructing the contributions of doctor and patient to the decision-making process, taking into account both the general characteristics of SDM and the different alternatives for the division of labour proposed in the medical literature. The tool can function as a starting point for well-founded evaluations of the reasonableness of these contributions.
|
| Document type |
Conference contribution
|
| Language |
English
|
| Published at |
https://ilias-argumentation.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ISSA_2018_Proceedings_of_the_Ninth_Confe-1.pdf
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
