Quels critères pour déterminer la "meilleure" explication scientifique?
| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2017
|
| Journal |
Tranel
|
| Volume | Issue number |
65
|
| Pages (from-to) |
79-88
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
|
| Abstract |
In justifying their choice of the 'best' scientific explanation from a number of candidate explanations, scientists may employ specific theoretical virtues and other criteria for good scientific theories. This paper is aimed at providing an inventory of such criteria and at analyzing how they function argumentatively by indicating their systematic place within the pattern of argumentation based on abduction.
|
| Document type |
Article
|
| Language |
French
|
| Published at |
http://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/tranel/files/Tranel/65/79-88_Wagemans_def.pdf
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
Back
