Constraints on the art and craft of constructing languages Lessons learnt from Classic interlinguistics

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2025
Journal RiCognizioni
Volume | Issue number 12 | 23
Pages (from-to) 19-32
Number of pages 14
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract

In the 21st century, constructed languages started to be normalized as an object of scientific study. Their construction has become increasingly popular thanks to the spread of the internet and, therefore, the availability of linguistic resources from the most ‘exotic’ human languages. The practice of constructing languages (in brief, conlanging) is often made by non-professional linguists with much enthusiasm and anecdotal experience but without a solid linguistic ground. Interlinguistics may be divided into four periods (preclassic, classic, modern, postmodern), where conlanging is the postmodern part. From its history, contemporary conlangers can profit from the errors and successes of their predecessors of classic Interlinguistics. This period started with the publication of Volapük (1879) until the release by IALA of Interlingua (1951). Its protagonists were mainly involved in the quest for the optimal International Auxiliary Language (IAL); nonetheless, their lessons are still valid.

Document type Article
Note Publisher Copyright: © 2025, Universita degli Studi di Torino, Dipartimento di Lingue e Letterature Straniere e Culture Moderne. All rights reserved.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8987/11928
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105010509852
Downloads
19_31+gobbo (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back