| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2018
|
| Host editors |
|
| Book title |
Argumentation and Inference
|
| Book subtitle |
Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| ISBN |
|
| Series |
Studies in logic
|
| Event |
2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| Volume | Issue number |
1
|
| Pages (from-to) |
45-50
|
| Publisher |
London: College Publications
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
|
| Abstract |
This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather than an argument scheme in contrast with the positions of Blair, Xie, and Wohlrapp on the subject.
|
| Document type |
Conference contribution
|
| Note |
Commentary on: J.A. Blair (2018) In defence of conduction: Two neglected features of argumentation. Argumentation and Inference : proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, pp 45-50.
|
| Language |
English
|
| Published at |
https://www.academia.edu/41700761/Argumentation_based_on_conduction
|
| Other links |
http://collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00010
|
|
Permalink to this page
|