Argumentation Based on Conduction Commentary on Blair's In Defence of Conduction: Two Neglected Features of Argumentation
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2018 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Argumentation and Inference |
| Book subtitle | Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation |
| ISBN |
|
| Series | Studies in logic |
| Event | 2nd European Conference on Argumentation |
| Volume | Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 45-50 |
| Publisher | London: College Publications |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | This commentary presents the view that "conductive argument" is an argumentation structure rather than an argument scheme in contrast with the positions of Blair, Xie, and Wohlrapp on the subject. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Note | Commentary on: J.A. Blair (2018) In defence of conduction: Two neglected features of argumentation. Argumentation and Inference : proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation, pp 45-50. |
| Language | English |
| Published at |
https://www.academia.edu/41700761/Argumentation_based_on_conduction
(Final published version)
|
| Other links | |
| Permalink to this page | |
