Reply to commentary on Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2016 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Argumentation, Objectivity and Bias: Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, Vol. 11, University of Windsor, May 18-21, 2016 |
| Event | The 11th conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentatio |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Publisher | Windsor, ON: OSSA |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In the commentary, Dr. Yun Xie challenges important aspects of the theoretical framework of the table by providing a number of examples that illustrate specific problems. In this short reply, I will provide alternative reconstructions of these examples and indicate whether – and if so, how – I think these problems can be solved. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/163/ |
| Downloads |
Reply to commentary on Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
