An Individual-Differences Framework for Comparing Nonnative With Native Speakers: Perspectives From BLC Theory

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 03-2019
Journal Language Learning
Volume | Issue number 69 | S1
Pages (from-to) 157-183
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract
This article proposes basic (shared) and extended (nonshared) language cognition in native speakers as a function of two types of extralinguistic attributes: (a) degree of being multilingual and (b) variables related to amount and type of literacy experiences (e.g., level of education). This approach may throw new light on the question of whether bilinguals can attain complete or native proficiency in two (or more) languages and the question of whether both early and late second language (L2) learners can attain native levels of L2 proficiency. An adequate language acquisition theory should explain why some structures are and some other structures are not comprehended and produced by all native speakers and also describe the acquisition over time (development) of lexical‐grammatical structures comprehended or produced by all native speakers or only by some. It is argued that usage‐based linguistics stands a better chance of accomplishing this task than generative linguistics.
Document type Review article
Note In supplement: Currents in Language Learning Series: Individual Differences in First and Second Language Ultimate Attainment and Their Causes
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12317
Downloads
Hulstijn-2019-Language_Learning (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back