Globalization and working time: Work-place hours and flexibility in Germany

Authors
Publication date 2007
Series AIAS working paper, 07/59
Number of pages 45
Publisher Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced labour Studies, University of Amsterdam
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS)
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
This paper examines how economic globalization affects work-place arrangements regulating
working time in industrialized countries. Exposure to foreign direct investment and trade can have
off-setting effects for work-place bargaining over standard hours and work-time flexibilization, and
can be expected to more strongly spur the latter than the former given stronger employer support
for and weaker employee opposition to flexible time management in open economies. The paper
also considers, however, how works council or other work-place representation likely mediate
which of globalization’s effects dominates the shaping of work-time. Based on enterprise-level panel
data from the German Federal Labor Office, the analysis supports two major findings consistent
with such expectations. First, globalization measured at the establishment or branch level -
including total foreign direct investment (FDI), trade, and export orientation (share of foreign sales)
- tends to have either no or weakly negative effects on total standard working hours, but to yield
higher incidence of overtime, temporary and fixed-contract work. Second, works councils mediate
these effects in ways that differ between standard hours and flexibilization. With respect to standard
weekly hours, globalization measures tend to trigger more standard hours among firms without
works councils, but fewer hours among firms with works councils. With respect to flexibilization,
however, globalization tends to modestly spur incidence of temporary- or fixed-term contracts and
overtime, and to do so more strongly where works councils are present than when they are not.
These results suggest how economic openness can have important, uneven consequences for
working time, and that firm-level institutional context can channel those consequences, highlighting
an area of agency in responses to globalization.
Document type Working paper
Note October 2007
Language English
Published at http://www.uva-aias.net/uploaded_files/publications/WP59-1.pdf
Permalink to this page
Back