Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 33
Number of items: 33
  • Open Access
    Urkens, J., D'Haenens, L., & Harambam, J. (2026). Media diversity and the epistemic expectations of journalism: Public service media’s responses to alternative media and the challenge of democratic integrity. In A. Balčytienė, P. Bajomi-Lázár, & H. Sousa (Eds.), Digital Media Shadowing Democracy: Technology, Communication, and Power (pp. 109-126). Nordicom. https://doi.org/10.48335/9789189864290-6
  • Kloosterboer, N., & Harambam, J. (2026). The Extreme Actor's Perspective, and Why It Matters for Explanation. In R. Peels, & L. L. Dawson (Eds.), Explaining Extreme Belief and Behavior: Theoretical, Methodological, and Ethical Challenges (pp. 53-80). (Extreme Belief and Behavior Series). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197768914.003.0004
  • Open Access
    Harambam, J. (2025). De waarheid in dialoog: Over hoe burgerberaden beter kunnen omgaan met post‑truth problematiek. In H. Moors, & J. Stans (Eds.), Een geschenk voor de democratie?: Perspectieven op de ontwikkeling van burgerberaden (pp. 73-91). Boom. https://www.boomportaal.nl/boek/9789047302582
  • Open Access
    Urkens, J., Harambam, J., & D'Haenens, L. (2025). Alternatieve complotmedia, een doorn in het oog van de democratie? Tijdschrift Sociologie, 6, 240-253. https://doi.org/10.38139/ts.94100
  • Open Access
    Urkens, J., Harambam, J., & d'Haenens, L. (2025). Threat or menace to media pluralism? A framework to assess alternative conspiracy media in today’s information landscape. Journalism, 26(11), 2364-2381. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241277084
  • Open Access
    Grusauskaite, K., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2025). Reactionary Exiles. How Conspiracy Theorists Deal with Socio-Technological Exclusion. Cultural Sociology, 19(4), 594-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755241248726
  • Open Access
    van der Tak, E. B., & Harambam, J. (2025). Caught in Construction: Why Dutch Sovereign Citizens Challenge the Bureaucratic State. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 54(6), 818-847. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416251376522
  • Open Access
    van der Tak, E. B., & Harambam, J. (2024). Reclaiming agency against the new world order: Beyond the coping mechanism frame in conspiracy theory studies. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 11(4), 489-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2024.2352455
  • Open Access
    de Weger, E., Fraaije, A., Harambam, J., & Willems, W. (2024). Dealing with the Pitfalls of Inclusion and Diversity: How to Involve Citizens Experiencing Distance from and Distrust of Science and Governance. In B. J. Regeer, P. Klaassen, & J. E. W. Broerse (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity for Transformation: Responding to Societal Challenges through Multi-actor, Reflexive Practices (pp. 347-369). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60974-9_12
  • Open Access
    Grusauskaite, K., Carbone, L., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2024). Debating (in) echo chambers: How culture shapes communication in conspiracy theory networks on YouTube. New Media and Society, 26(12), 7037-7057. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231162585
Page 1 of 4