Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 8
Number of items: 8
  • Open Access
    Booij, A. S., van Praag, B. M. S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2010). A parametric analysis of prospect theory’s functionals for the general population. Theory and Decision, 68(1-2), 115-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-009-9144-4
  • Booij, A. S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2009). A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(4), 651-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.004
  • Open Access
    Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2009). A truth serum for non-Bayesians : correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. The Review of Economic Studies, 76(4), 1461-1489. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00557.x
  • Offerman, T., Sonnemans, J., van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2007). A truth-serum for non-Bayesians : correcting proper scoring rules for risk attitudes. Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde. http://www1.fee.uva.nl/creed/pdffiles/propscr05oct07.pdf
  • Open Access
    van de Kuilen, G. (2007). The economic measurement of psychological risk attitudes. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. Thela Thesis / Tinbergen Institute.
  • van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2006). Learning in the Allais paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(3), 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-006-0390-3
  • Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2004). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 7(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74
  • Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., & van de Kuilen, G. (2001). Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: evidence from a meta-analysis. University of Amsterdam.
Page of