Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 518
Number of items: 518
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2009). Redelijkheid en overredingskracht van argumentatie : een historisch-filosofische studie over de combinatie van het dialectische en het retorische perspectief op argumentatie in de pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The language of argumentation in Dutch. Argumentation and Advocacy, 44(3), 155-158.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2008). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 475-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.002
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The need for well-considered normativity in the study of argumentation. In T. Suzuki, T. Kato, & A. Kubuta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation: argumentation, the law and justice (pp. 57-65). Japan Debate Association.
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). The study of argumentation. In A. A. Lunsford, K. H. Wilson, & R. A. Eberly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 109-124). Sage.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 1-26). (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Within the bounds of reason: strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. In K. Korta, & J. Garmendia (Eds.), Meaning, intentions, and argumentation (pp. 209-235). (CSLI lecture notes; No. 186). CSLI Publications.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: exploring the boundaries of reasonableness. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 13-25). Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Kinship: the relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In G. Hauser (Ed.), Philosophy and rhetoric in dialogue: redrawing their intellectual landscape (pp. 51-70). Pennsylvania State University Press. http://books.google.nl/books?id=_AcYe44YCu4C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_navlinks_s
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Rhetoric in a dialectical framework: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 133-151). (Dialogue studies; No. 2). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=G3cy1xoIIUIC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=rhetoric+in+a+dialectical+framework+weigand&ots=OqtR_a9Z2c&sig=gMdZEzLavm6VMM7Yq57HpU8xhG4
Page 10 of 52