Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 1,033
Number of items: 1,033
  • Kamps, J., Marx, M. J., Monz, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Exploiting structure for information retrieval. In M. F. Moens, R. de Busser, D. Hiemstra, & W. Kraaij (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Dutch Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR-2002) (pp. 19-26). K.U. Leuven.
  • de Rijke, M., & Wansing, H. (2002). Proofs and expressiveness in alethic modal logic. In D. Jacquette (Ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic (pp. 422-441). Blackwell Publishing.
  • Areces, C. E., & de Rijke, M. (2002). From description to hybrid logic, and back. In Advances in Modal Logic 2002 (pp. 17-36)
  • Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M., de Rijke, M., & Wansing, H. (2002). Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 3. World Scientific. http://www.aiml.net/volumes/volume3/
  • Caracciolo, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Structured access to scientific information. In Proceedings of the First Global WordNet Conference (pp. 187-191). CIIL.
  • Kamps, J., Monz, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Combining morphological and ngram evidence for monolingual document retrieval. In M. F. Moens, R. De Busser, D. Hiemstra, & W. Kraaij (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Dutch Information Retrieval Workshop (DIR 2002) (pp. 47-51)
  • Marx, M. J., Kamps, J., & de Rijke, M. (2002). The University of Amsterdam at INEX-2002. In N. Fuhr, N. Gövert, G. Kazai, & M. Lalmas (Eds.), INEX 2002 Workshop Proceedings (pp. 24-28)
  • Monz, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Morphological analysis in monolingula information retrieval for Dutch, German and Italian. Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  • Monz, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Knowledge-intensive question answering. In Proceedings BNAIC'02 (pp. 467-468)
  • Monz, C., & de Rijke, M. (2002). Shallow morphological analysis in monolingual information retrieval for Dutch, German and Italian. In C. Peters, M. Braschler, J. Gonzalo, & M. Kluck (Eds.), Evaluation of Cross-Language Information Retrieval Systems. Second Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum, CLEF 2001
Page 87 of 104