Search results

    Filter results

  • Full text

  • Document type

  • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 134
Number of items: 134
  • Open Access
    Hesselink, M. W. (2008). The values underlying the Draft Common Frame of Reference: what role for fairness and 'social justice'? (Study; No. PE 408.312). European Parliament, Directorate General Internal Policies of the Union.
  • Bueno Diaz, O. (2007). Franchising in European contract law : a comparison between the main obligations of the contracting parties in the Principles of European Law on Commercial Agency, Franchise and Distribution Contracts (PEL CAFDC), French and Spanish law. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. Sellier European Law Publishers.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2006). Non-Mandatory Rules in European Contract Law. In A. F. Salomons, & G. J. P. de Vries (Eds.), Pro Forma? Essays on the Role of Formal Rules and Formal Requirements in Private Law (pp. 139-174). Boom Juridische uitgevers.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2006). Case 237/02[2004] ECR 1-3403 (ECJ-Freiburger Kommunalbauten v Hofstetter). Case note on: Case 237/02[2004] ECR 1-3403, 1/04/04 European Review of Contract Law, 2006(3), 366-375.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2006). The Ideal of Codification and the Dynamics of Europeanisation: the Dutch Experience. European Law Journal, 2006(12), 279-305.
  • Hesselink, M. W., Rutgers, J. W., Bueno Diaz, O., Scotton, M., & Veldman, M. (2006). Principles of European Law, volume 3: Commercial Agency, Franchise, and Distribution Contracts. (Principles of European Law / Study Group on a Civil Code, vol. 2); No. 3). Oxford University Press.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (Ed.) (2006). The Politics of a European Civil Code. Kluwer Law International.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2006). ECJ Cases on European Contract Law. Ars Aequi.
  • Rutgers, J. W., & Hesselink, M. W. (2006). ECJ Cases on European Contract law, A Selection, Ars Aequi Jurisprudentie. Ars Aequi Libri.
  • Hesselink, M. W. (2005). Who has a stake in European contract law. European Review of Contract Law, 1(3), 295-296.
Page 8 of 14