Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 518
Number of items: 518
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). The disguised 'abusive ad hominem' empirically investigated: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning, 18(3), 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2012.678666
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Dialogue rules for argumentation. In S. Cantarini (Ed.), Dialogue: state of the art: studies in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 272-286). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 22). Lincom Europa.
  • Open Access
    Ihnen Jory, C. (2012). Pragmatic argumentation in law-making debates: instruments for the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation at the second reading of the British Parliament. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. Sic Sat.
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2012). Strategic maneuvering in political argumentation: the plenary debate in the European Parliament as an argumentative activity type. In M. Constantinescu, G. Stoica, & O. Uţă Bărbulescu (Eds.), Modernitate și interdisciplinaritate în cercetarea lingvistică: omagiu doamnei profesor Liliana Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu (pp. 227-241). Editura Universităţii din București. http://editura-unibuc.ro/?p=1772
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2012). Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective: preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9234-7
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). National Communication Association.
  • van Eemeren, F., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Argumentatie: inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. - 4e herz. dr. Noordhoff.
  • Open Access
    Tonnard, Y. M. (2011). Getting an issue on the table: A pragma-dialectical study of presentational choices in confrontational strategic maneuvering in Dutch parliamentary debate. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2011). The extended pragma-dialectical argumentation theory empirically interpreted. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 411-422). Rozenberg/Sic Sat.
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse: extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. (Argumentation in context; No. 2). John Benjamins.
Page 7 of 52