Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 169
Number of items: 169
  • Fennema, M. (2005). De vergeten slavenopstand van Haïti. De Academische Boekengids, (49), 17-19.
  • van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. N. (2005). Introduction to Extremism. Commisioned by the Dutch Ministry of Justice. In J. Doomernik, & A. van Heelsum (Eds.), MIDET, a database on the subject of Migration, Integration, Diversity, Extremism and terrorism Ministry of Justice.
  • Open Access
    Vermeulen, F. F. (2005). The immigrant organising process: the emergence and persistence of Turkish immigrant organisations in Amsterdam and Berlin and Surinamese organisations in Amsterdam, 1960-2000. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. AUP.
  • Open Access
    van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. N. (2005). Why Some Anti-Immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-Step Model of Aggregate Electoral Support. Comparative Political Studies, 38(5), 537-573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273928
  • Fennema, M. (2004). Populist Parties of the Right. In J. Rydgren (Ed.), Movements of Exclusion: Radical Right-Wing Populism Nova Scotia Publishers.
  • Fennema, M., & Nobel, J. (2004). Economische elites na de dekolonisatie van Nederlands-Indië: verlies van posities, desintegratie van netwerken, verschuiving van zwaartepunten. Mens en Maatschappij, 78.
  • Fennema, M., & Schijf, H. (2004). Inleiding. In M. Fennema, & H. Schijf (Eds.), De Nederlandse Elite in de Twintigste Eeuw. Boeknummer van Mens en Maatschappij Amsterdam University Press.
  • Fennema, M. (2004). Concept and Measurement of Civic Communities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 30(3), 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830410001682025
  • Fennema, M., van der Brug, W., van den Broeck, B., & Foblets, M.-C. (2004). La faillite de l'intégration. Le débat multiculturel en Flandres. Academia-Bruylant.
  • Carroll, W. K., & Fennema, M. (2004). Problems in the study of the transnational business community. A Reply to Kentor and Jang. International Sociology, 19(3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580904045346
Page 7 of 17