Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 65
Number of items: 65
  • Zand-Scholten, A., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1999). Psychometrische analyse van 168 metingen op het cognitieve, structurele en affectieve domein afgenomen in de testweek 29. Faculteit der Psychologie.
  • Bermond, B., Vorst, H. C. M., Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M., & Gerritsen, W. (1999). The Amsterdam Alexithymia Scale: Its psychometric values and correlations with other personality traits. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1159/000012340
  • Vorst, H. C. M., & Bermond, B. (1999). Emotional maturity, physical; growth and interests. In The (Non) Expression of Emotions in Health and Disease (pp. 46-46). Tilburg University.
  • Smits, J. P. J. M., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Vorst, H. (1999). Alternative Missing Data Techniques to GPA.
  • Oosterveld, P., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). Methods for the construction of questionnaires, a comparative study. In L. Lyberg (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Survey Measurement and Process Quality (pp. 269-274)
  • Hox, J. J. C. M., de Leeuw, E. D., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). A reasoned action explanation for survey nonresponse. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), International perspectives on nonresponse (pp. 101-110). Statistics Finland.
  • Hox, J. J., de Leeuw, E. D., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). Congresverslag. A reasoned action explanation for survey nonresponce. In S. Laaksonen (Ed.), International perspectives on nonresponse (pp. 101-110). Statistics Finland.
  • Oosterveld, P., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). Methoden voor vragenlijstconstructie. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 51, 11-27.
  • Oosterveld, P., & Vorst, H. C. M. (1996). Note on the reliability and validity of self-evaluation of ability scales. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 82(3), 991-994. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.991
  • Hox, J., de Leeuw, E., & Vorst, H. (1995). Survey participation as reasoned action; a behavioral paradigm for survey nonresponse? Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 48, 52-67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24362142
Page 5 of 7