Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 83
Number of items: 83
  • Open Access
    Scharnagl, B., Vrugt, J. A., Vereecken, H., & Herbst, M. (2011). Inverse modelling of in situ soil water dynamics: investigating the effect of different prior distributions of the soil hydraulic parameters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(10), 3043-3059. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3043-2011
  • Open Access
    Partridge, D. G., Vrugt, J. A., Tunved, P., Ekman, A. M. L., Gorea, D., & Sooroshian, A. (2011). Inverse modeling of cloud-aerosol interactions -- Part 1: Detailed response surface analysis. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11(14), 7269-7287. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7269-2011
  • Open Access
    Vrugt, J. A., & ter Braak, C. J. F. (2011). DREAM(D): An adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation algorithm to solve discrete, noncontinuous, and combinatorial posterior parameter estimation problems. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(12), 3701-3713. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3701-2011
  • Huisman, J. A., Rings, J., Vrugt, J. A., Sorg, J., & Vereecken, H. (2010). Hydraulic properties of a model dike from coupled Bayesian and multi-criteria hydrogeophysical inversion. Journal of Hydrology, 380(1-2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.023
  • Keating, E. H., Doherty, J., Vrugt, J. A., & Kang, Q. (2010). Optimization and uncertainty assessment of strongly nonlinear groundwater models with high parameter dimensionality. Water Resources Research, 46, W10517. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008584
  • Schoups, G., Vrugt, J. A., Fenicia, F., & van de Giesen, N. C. (2010). Corruption of accuracy and efficiency of Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation by inaccurate numerical implementation of conceptual hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 46, W10530. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008648
  • Schoups, G., & Vrugt, J. A. (2010). A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors. Water Resources Research, 46, W10531. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008933
  • Open Access
    Scharnagl, B., Vrugt, J. A., Vereecken, H., & Herbst, M. (2010). Information content of incubation experiments for inverse estimation of pools in the Rothamsted carbon model: a Bayesian perspective. Biogeosciences, 7(2), 763-776. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-763-2010
  • Open Access
    Diks, C. G. H., & Vrugt, J. A. (2010). Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applications. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24(6), 809-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-010-0378-z
  • Vrugt, J. A., ter Braak, C. J. F., Gupta, H. V., & Robinson, B. A. (2009). Response to comment by Keith Beven on "Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling?". Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(7), 1061-1062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0284-9
Page 4 of 9