Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 518
Number of items: 518
  • Open Access
    Popa, E. O. (2016). Thought experiments in academic communication: A pragma-dialectical method for reconstructing the argumentative use of imaginary scenarios in academic disputes. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F. H., & Andone, C. (2016). Argumentation and communicative practices. In A. Rocci, & L. de Saussure (Eds.), Verbal Communication (pp. 245-268). (Handbook of Communication Science; No. 3). Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255478-014
  • Open Access
    Boers, M. (2016). A controversy on moral judgment: Fifteen historian-reviewers in the controversy on Hannah Arendt’s book Eichmann in Jerusalem in the US, West Germany and France, 1963-1967. A historical and a pragma-dialectical perspective. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • Open Access
    Omar, A. A. A. M. H. (2016). Strategic maneuvering in supporting the feasibility of political change: A pragma-dialectical analysis of Egyptian anti-regime columns. [Thesis, externally prepared, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • Open Access
    Visser, J. C. (2016). A dialogue game for critical discussion: Groundwork in the formalisation and computerisation of the pragma-dialectical model of argumentation. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Reconstructing argumentative discourse with the help of speech act conditions. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 469-486). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_24
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The skill of identifying argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 733-741). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_39
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 793-811). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_43
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2015). The disguised ad baculum fallacy empirically investigated: Strategic maneuvering with threats. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 813-824). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_44
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2015). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 595-609). (Argumentation Library; No. 27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20955-5_31
Page 3 of 52