Search results
Results: 90
Number of items: 90
-
Senftleben, M. (2025). Win-Win: How to Remove Copyright Obstacles to AI Training While Ensuring Author Remuneration (and Why the AI Act Fails to do the Magic). Chicago-Kent Law Review, 100(1), 7-55. Article 5. https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol100/iss1/5/ -
Senftleben, M. (2024). UGC Creation and Dissemination – The Role of Platforms, Copyright Holders and the Court of Justice in Safeguarding Freedom of Expression and Information. In F. Thouvenin, A. Peukert, T. Jaeger, & C. Geiger (Eds.), Kreation Innovation Märkte = Creation Innovation Markets : Festschrift Reto M. Hilty (pp. 347-357). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-68599-0_24
-
Mezei, P., Senftleben, M., Sganga, C., & Geiger, C. (2024). Opinion of the European Copyright Society on the CG and YN v Pelham GmbH and Others, Case C-590/23 (Pelham II). Web publication or website, Kluwer Copyright Blog. https://legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com/copyright-blog/opinion-of-the-european-copyright-society-on-the-cg-and-yn-v-pelham-gmbh-and-others-case-c-59023-pelham-ii/
-
European Copyright Society, van Eechoud, M., Metzger, A., Quintais, J. P., & Rognstad, O.-A. (2024). Opinion of the European Copyright Society on certain selected aspects of Case C-227/23, Kwantum Nederland and Kwantum België. (ECS opinions). European Copyright Society. https://europeancopyrightsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ecs-opinion-on-kwantum-_final-rev-24-april-2024.pdf -
Senftleben, M. (2024). Protection against unfair competition in the European Union: from divergent national approaches to harmonized rules on search result rankings, influencers and greenwashing. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 19(2), 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad123 -
Szkalej, K., & Senftleben, M. (2024). Generative AI and Creative Commons Licences: The Application of Share Alike Obligations to Trained Models, Curated Datasets and AI Output. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 15(3), 313-337. https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/415 -
Stančiauskas, V., Kazlauskaitė, D., Dėlkutė-Morgan, R., Šiaulytytė, G., Kublashvili, A., Voronecki, T., Senftleben, M., Szkalej, K., Buijs, D., Van Eechoud, M., Irion, K., Buri, I., Frigeri, M., Karabuga, E., King, L., Margoni, T., Schirru, L., Stähler, L., Sganga, C., ... Edwards, E. (2024). Improving access to and reuse of research results, publications and data for scientific purposes: Study to evaluate the effects of the EU copyright framework on research and the effects of potential interventions and to identify and present relevant provisions for research in EU data and digital legislation, with a focus on rights and obligations. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/633395 -
Senftleben, M. (2024). Developing Defences for Fashion Upcycling in EU Trademark Law. GRUR International, 73(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad131 -
Senftleben, M., & van Kan, B. (2024). Merk en fashion upcycling: inbreuk en mogelijke verweren. Berichten Industriële Eigendom, 2024(2), 85-95. https://www.berichtenie.nl/art/90-6170_Merk-en-fashion-upcycling-inbreuk-en-mogelijke-verweren -
Senftleben, M. (2024). Fashion Upcycling as Protected Free Speech in Trademark Law. International and Comparative Law Review, 31(2), 349-387. Article 5. https://repository.law.miami.edu/umiclr/vol31/iss2/5/
Page 3 of 9