Lavranos, N. (2006). The Mox Plant ruling of the ECJ: How exclusive is the jurisdiction of the ECJ?European Current Law, xi-xv.
Lavranos, N. (2006). The MOX Plant and IJzeren Rijn Disputes: Which Court is the Supreme Arbiter?Leiden Journal of International Law, 223-246.
Lavranos, N. (2006). Protecting its exclusive jurisdiction: the Mox Plant-judgment of the ECJ. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 479-493.
Lavranos, N. (2006). Judicial Review of UN Sanctions by the Court of First Instance. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11, 471-490.
Lavranos, N. (2006). The Mox Plant judgment of the ECJ: How exclusive is the jurisdiction of the ECJ?European Environmental Law Review, 291-296.
Lavranos, N. (2006). Uitbreiding van mededingingsbevoegdheden van de Europese Commissie op basis van internationale verdragen. Sociaal-economische Wetgeving : Tijdschrift voor Europees en Economisch Recht, 54(1), 10-13.
Lavranos, N. (2006). Unavailable Judicial Remedies and the Rule of Law. From the Board. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 33(3), 205-206.
Lavranos, N. (2006). Nationale constitutionele implicaties van de Bosphorus en Yusuf/Kadi zaken; schaf artikel 120 Grondwet af. In Publikaties van de Staatsrechtkring. Rechtsvorming en Governance (pp. 103-110). Kluwer.
Lavranos, N. (2006). [Review of: R. Oen (2005) Internationale Streitbeilegung im Kontext gemischter Verträge der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und ihrer Mitgliedstaaten]. Common Market Law Review, 1478-1480.
Lavranos, N. (2005). ECJ and CFI (The Chiquita and Van Parys Judgements: An Exception to the Rule of Law). Case note on: ECJ and CFI, 1/01/00Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 2005, 449-460.