Search results
Results: 116
Number of items: 116
-
Wass, C., Dini, P., Eiser, T., Heistracher, T. J., Lampoltshammer, T. J., Marcon, G., Sageder, C., Tsiavos, P., & Winkels, R. (2013). OpenLaws.eu. In E. Schweighofer, F. Kummer, & W. Hötzendorfer (Eds.), Abstraktion und Applikation: Tagungsband des 16. Internationalen Rechtsinformatik Symposions IRIS 2013 = Abstraction and application: proceedings of the 16th International Legal Informatics Symposium: 21. bis 23. Februar 2013, Universität Salzburg (pp. 209-212). Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft. https://www.ocg.at/de/abstraktion-und-applikation-iris2013 -
Winkels, R., Douw, J., & Veldhoen, S. (2013). Experiments in automated support for argument reconstruction. In B. Verheij (Ed.), Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law: Rome, June 10-14, 2013, Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche: proceedings of the conference (pp. 232-236). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2514601.2514633 -
Winkels, R., Boer, A., & Plantevin, I. (2013). Creating Context Networks in Dutch Legislation. In K. D. Ashley (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2013: the twenty-sixth annual conference (pp. 155-164). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 259). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-359-9-155 -
Winkels, R., & de Ruyter, J. (2012). Survival of the Fittest: Network Analysis of Dutch Supreme Court Cases. In M. Palmirani, U. Pagallo, P. Casanovas, & G. Sartor (Eds.), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems : Models and Ethical Challenges for Legal Systems, Legal Language and Legal Ontologies, Argumentation and Software Agents: international workshop AICOL-III, held as part of the 25th IVR Congress Frankfurt am Main, Germany, August 15-16, 2011: revised selected papers (pp. 106-115). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 7639), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35731-2_7
-
Winkels, R., & Hoekstra, R. (2012). Automatic extraction of legal concepts and definitions. In B. Schäfer (Ed.), Legal knowledge and information systems: JURIX 2012: the twenty-fifth annual conference (Vol. 250, pp. 157-166). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 250). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-167-0-157 -
Winkels, R., de Ruyter, J., & Kroese, H. (2011). Determining authority of Dutch case law. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 235, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-981-3-103 -
Boer, A., van Engers, T., & Winkels, R. (2010). Traceability and change in legal requirements engineering. In P. Casanovas, U. Pagallo, G. Sartor, & G. Ajani (Eds.), AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Complex Systems, the Semantic Web, Ontologies, Argumentation, and Dialogue: International Workshops AICOL-I/IVR-XXIV Beijing, China, September19, 2009 and AICOL-II/JURIX 2009, Rotterdam,The Netherlands, December 16, 2009 : revised selected papers (pp. 74-92). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6237), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_6
-
de Maat, E., & Winkels, R. (2010). Automated classification of norms in sources of law. In E. Francesconi, S. Montemagni, W. Peters, & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Semantic Processing of Legal Texts: Where the Language of Law Meets the Law of Language (pp. 170-191). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Vol. 6036), (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_10
Page 3 of 12