Search results

    Filter results

  • Full text

  • Document type

  • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 518
Number of items: 518
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2008). Una teoria sistematica dell'argomentazione: l'approccio pragma-dialettico. (Il quadrato delle opposizioni). Mimesis.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). The development of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. In A. J. Aguayo, & T. R. Steffensmeier (Eds.), Readings on argumentation (pp. 12-25). State College, PA.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 9). Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 181-195). (Controversies; No. 6). John Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Understanding argumentation: work in progress. Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Rhetoric, argument and persuasion. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. - Vol. 9: Precision journalism, rhetoric in Western Europe: Britain (pp. 4215-4219). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.x
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. vii-viii). (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Más sobre falacias como descarrilamientos de maniobras estratégicas: el caso de 'tu quoque'. In C. Santibáñez Yáñez, & R. Marafioti (Eds.), De las falacias: argumentación y comunicación (pp. 37-51). (Ciencias del lenguaje). Biblos. http://books.google.nl/books?id=rD90Eoi6BYMC&lpg=PA54&ots=zfmLgMc7Ar&dq=santibanez%20De%20las%20falacias%3A%20argumentaci%C3%B3n%20y%20comunicaci%C3%B3n&pg=PA37
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Valuing validity as reasonableness: rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. In P. Nerhot (Ed.), Truth and judgement (pp. 199-222). (Filosofia; No. 195). Franco Angeli.
Page 11 of 52