UvA DARE | Search results

UvA-DARE

Digital Academic Repository

UvA-DARE

Full text
Document type

Organisation

Results: 518

Number of items: 518

van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). Rhetoric in a dialectical framework: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (pp. 133-151). (Dialogue studies; No. 2). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=G3cy1xoIIUIC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=rhetoric+in+a+dialectical+framework+weigand&ots=OqtR_a9Z2c&sig=gMdZEzLavm6VMM7Yq57HpU8xhG4
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (2008). Una teoria sistematica dell'argomentazione: l'approccio pragma-dialettico. (Il quadrato delle opposizioni). Mimesis.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2008). The development of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. In A. J. Aguayo, & T. R. Steffensmeier (Eds.), Readings on argumentation (pp. 12-25). State College, PA.
van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, D. C. Williams, & I. Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 9). Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H., Williams, D. C., & Zagar, I. Z. (2008). Understanding argumentation: work in progress. Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Rhetoric, argument and persuasion. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. - Vol. 9: Precision journalism, rhetoric in Western Europe: Britain (pp. 4215-4219). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.x
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. vii-viii). (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 181-195). (Controversies; No. 6). John Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
van Eemeren, F. H. (2008). Special issue on Strategic Maneuvering in Institutional Contexts dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956-2008). Argumentation, 22(3), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9084-0

Page 11 of 52