Search results
Results: 28
Number of items: 28
-
Brugman, B. C., & Burgers, C. (2025). Satire omnivores: Characteristics of Dutch viewers of American satire. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 53(1), 73-90. https://doi.org/10.5117/TCW2025.1.005.BRUG -
Brugman, B. (2024). Wat is beter voor duurzaamheidsrapportages: Morele of pragmatische taal?. Web publication or website, SWOCC. https://www.swocc.nl/kennisbank-item/wat-is-beter-voor-duurzaamheidsrapportages-morele-of-pragmatische-taal/
-
Boukes, M., Droog, E., Brugman, B. C., & Burgers, C. (2024). Political satire. In N. D. Bowman (Ed.), Entertainment Media and Communication (pp. 273-288). (Handbooks of communication science; Vol. 20). Mouton-De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110792881-020 -
Eisele, O., Brugman, B. C., & Marschlich, S. (2024). The moral foundations of responsible business: Using computational text analysis to explore the salience of morality in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 50(2), Article 102453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102453 -
Brugman, B. C. (2024). How the Effects of Emphasizing Ethics are Examined: A Systematic Review of Moral Framing Experiments. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48(4), 436-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2024.2393845 -
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2023). Frame repertoires at the genre level: An automated content analysis of character, emotional, and moral framing in satirical and regular news. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 67(1), 90-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2164282 -
Skalicky, S., Brugman, B. C., Droog, E., & Burgers, C. (2023). Satire from a far-away land: Psychological distance and satirical news. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1548–1565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2014545 -
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2023). Humor in satirical news headlines: Analyzing humor form and content, and their relations with audience engagement. Mass Communication & Society, 26(6), 963-990. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2144747
Page 2 of 3