Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 21
Number of items: 21
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S. (2023). To believe or not to believe: Open science and replication in the psychology of religion. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
  • Open Access
    Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221128319
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., Bartoš, F., Beitner, J., De Ron, J., Gligoric, V., Kleinberg, B., Van der Cruyssen, I., van Dongen, N. N. N., van Ravenzwaaij, D., Verschuere, B., Wiechert, S., Zarzeczna, N., van Elk, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Većkalov, B., & The MARP Team (2023). A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 13(3), 237-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070255
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J. M., Bulbulia, J. A., Ross, R. M., McKay, R., Altay, S., Bendixen, T., Berniūnas, R., Cheshin, A., Gentili, C., Georgescu, R., Gervais, W. M., Hagel, K., Kavanagh, C., Levy, N., Neely, A., Qiu, L., Rabelo, A., Ramsay, J. E., ... van Elk, M. (2022). The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(4), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01273-8
  • Hoogeveen, S., & van Elk, M. (2021). Advancing the Cognitive Science of Religion through Replication and Open Science. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion, 6(1-2), 158–190. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.39039
  • Open Access
    Tierney, W., Hardy, J., Ebersole, C. R., Viganola, D., Clemente, E. G., Gordon, M., Hoogeveen, S., Haaf, J., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., Pfeiffer, T., Huang, J. L., Vaughn, L. A., DeMarree, K., Igou, E. R., Chapman, H., Gantman, A., Vanaman, M., Wylie, J., ... Uhlmann, E. L. (2021). A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 93, Article 104060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060
  • Open Access
    Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Teaching Good Research Practices: Protocol of a Research Master Course. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719858807
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S., Snoek, L., & van Elk, M. (2020). Religious belief and cognitive conflict sensitivity: A preregistered fMRI study. Cortex, 129, 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.011
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Laypeople Can Predict Which Social-Science Studies Will Be Replicated Successfully. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(3), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920919667
  • Open Access
    Hoogeveen, S., Schjoedt, U., & van Elk, M. (2018). Did I do that? Expectancy effects of brain stimulation on error-related negativity and sense of agency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(11), 1720-1733. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01297
Page 2 of 3