Search results
Results: 27
Number of items: 27
-
Schellings, G., van Hout-Wolters, B., Veenman, M., & Meijer, J. (2008). Metacognitieve activiteiten meten: een vragenlijst vergeleken met de hardopdenkmethode. In W. Jochems, P. den Brok, T. Bergen, & M. van Eijck (Eds.), Licht op leren: proceedings van de 35e Onderwijs Research Dagen (pp. 288-290). ESoE Eindhoven School of Education, TU Eindhoven. http://www.ord2008.nl/public/File/Proceedings%20ORD%202008%20def.pdf
-
Schellings, G., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2008). Metacognition and learning from text: Constructing a metacognitive questionnaire for text studying. In A. Maes, & S. Ainsworth (Eds.), Proceedings EARLI Special Interest Group Text and Graphics: Exploiting the opportunities: Learning with textual, graphical and multimodal representations: Bi-annual conference, 27, 28 and 29 August 2008, Tilburg University, the Netherlands (pp. 127-130). Tilburg University. http://homepage.uvt.nl/~s179209/Proceedings_Earli_Sig2_Tilburg_2008.pdf
-
Schellings, G. L. M., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., Veenman, M. V. J., & Meijer, J. (2007). Assessing metacognitive activities: Is using a questionnaire a valid way? In B. Csapó, & C. Csíkos (Eds.), Developing potentials for learning. Abstracts. 12th Biennial conference for research on learning and instruction, Budapest, Hungary, August 28-September 1, 2007 (pp. 581). Szeged: Juhász Nyomda Szolgáltató Kft..
-
Schellings, G. L. M., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. (2005). Analysing think-aloud protocols of beginning readers: a two layered system. In C. P. Constantinou, D. Demetriou, A. Evagorou, M. Evagorou, A. Kofteros, M. Michael, C. Nicolaou, D. Papademetriou, & N. Papadouris (Eds.), Integrating multiple perspectives on effective learning environments. Abstracts 11th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 115). University of Cyprus.
-
Schellings, G. L. M., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1996). Selection of main points in instructional texts: influences of task demands. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 355-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969609547930
Page 2 of 3