Search results
Results: 70
Number of items: 70
-
Kolvoort, I. R., Temme, N., & van Maanen, L. (2023). The Bayesian Mutation Sampler Explains Distributions of Causal Judgments. Open Mind, 7, 318-349. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9kzb4, https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00080 -
van der Wal, O., Bachmann, D., Leidinger, A., van Maanen, L., Zuidema, W., & Schulz, K. (2022). Undesirable biases in NLP: Averting a crisis of measurement. (v1 ed.) ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.13709 -
van Maanen, L., & Miletić, S. (2021). The interpretation of behavior-model correlations in unidentified cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(2), 374-383. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01783-y -
Kolvoort, I., Davis, Z. J., Van Maanen, L., & Rehder, B. (2021). Variability in Causal Judgments. In 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021): Comparative Cognition Animal Minds : Vienna, Austria, 26-29 July 2021 (Vol. 2, pp. 1250-1256). (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; Vol. 43). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kf17429 -
Tran, N.-H., van Maanen, L., Heathcote, A., & Matzke, D. (2021). Systematic Parameter Reviews in Cognitive Modeling: Towards a Robust and Cumulative Characterization of Psychological Processes in the Diffusion Decision Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 608287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608287 -
van de Pol, I., Lodder, P., van Maanen, L., Steinert-Threlkeld, S., & Szymanik, J. (2021). Quantifiers satisfying semantic universals are simpler. In 43rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2021): Comparative Cognition Animal Minds : Vienna, Austria, 26-29 July 2021 (Vol. 2, pp. 756-762). (Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society; Vol. 43). Cognitive Science Society. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1vm445rp -
Ramotowska, S., Steinert-Threlkeld, S., Van Maanen, L., & Szymanik, J. (2020). Most, but not more than half, is proportion-dependent and sensitive to individual differences. In M. Franke, N. Kompa, M. Liu, J. L. Mueller, & J. Schwab (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 24 (Vol. 2, pp. 165–182). Osnabrück University. https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2020.v24i2.891 -
Katsimpokis, D., Hawkins, G. E., & van Maanen, L. (2020). Not all Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Manipulations Have the Same Psychological Effect. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3(3), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-020-00074-y -
Schlotterbeck, F., Ramotowska, S., van Maanen, L., & Szymanik, J. (2020). Representational complexity and pragmatics cause the monotonicity effect. In 42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2020): Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines : online, 29 July-1 August 2020 (Vol. 5, pp. 3397-3403). Cognitive Science Society. https://cogsci.mindmodeling.org/2020/papers/0825/index.html
Page 2 of 7