Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 44
Number of items: 44
  • Open Access
    Finkelman, M. D., Jamison, R. N., Kulich, R. J., Butler, S. F., Smits, N., & Weiner, S. G. (2020). A Comparison of Short Forms of the Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients With Pain – Revised (SOAPP-R). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 36(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000519
  • Open Access
    Conijn, J. M., Smits, N., & Hartman, E. E. (2020). Determining at what age children provide sound self-reports: An illustration of the validity-index approach. Assessment, 27(7), 1604-1618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119832655
  • Open Access
    Finkelman, M. D., Jamison, R. N., Magnuson, B., Kulich, R. J., Butler, S. F., Smits, N., & Weiner, S. G. (2019). Computer-based testing and the 12-item Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised: A combined approach to improving efficiency. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 24(1), Article e12145. https://doi.org/10.1111/jabr.12145
  • Open Access
    Oosterveld, P., Vorst, H. C. M., & Smits, N. (2019). Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals. Quality of Life Research, 28(9), 2501-2512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6
  • Open Access
    Flens, G., Smits, N., Terwee, C. B., Dekker, J., Huijbrechts, I., Spinhoven, P., & de Beurs, E. (2019). Development of a Computerized Adaptive Test for Anxiety Based on the Dutch–Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank. Assessment, 26(7), 1362-1374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117746742
  • Open Access
    Smits, N., Paap, M. C. S., & Böhnke, J. R. (2018). Some recommendations for developing multidimensional computerized adaptive tests for patient-reported outcomes. Quality of Life Research, 27(4), 1055-1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1821-8
  • Open Access
    Smits, N., van der Ark, L. A., & Conijn, J. M. (2018). Measurement versus prediction in the construction of patient-reported outcome questionnaires: Can we have our cake and eat it? Quality of Life Research, 7(27), 1673-1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1720-4
  • Open Access
    Fokkema, M., Smits, N., Zeileis, A., Hothorn, T., & Kelderman, H. (2018). Detecting treatment-subgroup interactions in clustered data with generalized linear mixed-effects model trees. Behavior Research Methods, 50(5), 2016-2034. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0971-x
  • Open Access
    Finkelman, M. D., Lowe, S. R., Kim, W., Gruebner, O., Smits, N., & Galea, S. (2018). Item Ordering and Computerized Classification Tests With Cluster-Based Scoring: An Investigation of the Countdown Method. Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000470
  • Open Access
    Crins, M. H. P., Terwee, C. B., Klausch, T., Smits, N., de Vet, H. C. W., Westhovens, R., Cella, D., Cook, K. F., Revicki, D. A., Leeuwen, J. V., Boers, M., Dekker, J., & Roorda, L. D. (2017). The Dutch–Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited strong psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 87, 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.011
Page 2 of 5