Search results
Results: 23,422
Number of items: 23,422
-
Tuominen, T. (2015). C-62/14 Gauweiler: How the ECJ avoided Stockholm syndrome but risks either a standoff or a stalemate. Web publication or website, BlogActiv.eu. http://acelg.blogactiv.eu/2015/10/26/c-6214-gauweiler-how-the-ecj-avoided-stockholm-syndrome-but-risks-either-a-standoff-or-a-stalemate/ -
Tauschinsky, E. (2015). SBC (C-355/10) vs Europol (C-363/14): What does the Court do with fundamental rights and essential elements?. Web publication or website, BlogActiv.eu. https://acelg.blogactiv.eu/2015/09/24/sbc-c-35510-vs-europol-c-36314-what-does-the-court-do-with-fundamental-rights-and-essential-elements/
-
Ó Fathaigh, R. (2015). IE-Ireland: New Freedom of Information Law. IRIS, 2015(1), 19-20. Article 25. http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2015/1/article25.en.html
-
Eckes, C. (2015). The CFSP and other EU policies: A difference in nature? European Foreign Affairs Review, 20(4), 535-552. https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2015044
-
Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Faure, M. G. (2015). The Economics of Disaster Relief. Law & Policy, 37(3), 180-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12036
-
Eckes, C. (2015). The reflexive relationship between internal and external sovereignty. Irish Journal of European Law, 18(1), 33-47. https://www.isel.ie/article/view-free/id/181
-
Schill, S. W. (2015). Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Conceptual Framework and Options for the Way Forward. (E15Initiative). International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development/World Economic Forum. http://e15initiative.org/publications/reforming-investor-state-dispute-settlement-isds-conceptual-framework-and-options-for-the-way-forward/
-
Tjon Soei Len, L. K. L. (2015). The Moral Limits of EU Internal Market Exchange: Equal Respect and Capabilities. (Discussion Paper SP IV; No. 2015-806). Berlin Social Science Center, Center for Global Constitutionalism. https://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2015/iv15-806.pdf
-
Mańko, R. (2015). Europeanisation of civil procedure: towards common minimum standards? (EPRS in-depth analysis; No. PE 559.499). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://doi.org/10.2861/670
Page 791 of 2343