Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 34,653
Number of items: 34,653
  • Mathijsen, M. (2010). De vermanende vinger van de literatuur. Jan Campert-stichting jaarboek, 2009, 86-94.
  • Marácz, L. (2010). De Hongaarse katholieke kerk en de geest van het neopaganisme. Theologisch Debat, 7(4), 44-51.
  • Sleeman, P. (2010). Superlative adjectives and the licensing of non-modal infinitival subject relatives. In P. Cabredo Hofherr, & O. Matushansky (Eds.), Adjectives: formal analyses in syntax and semantics (pp. 233-264). (Linguistik aktuell = Linguistics today; No. 153). Benjamins. http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/a.p.sleeman/bestanden/Infinitival%20relatives%20and%20superlatives.pdf
  • Ioffe, D. (2010). [Review of: M. Klimova (2009) Moi︠a︡ teorii︠a︡ literatury]. In Unknown IntelRos, MacArthur Foundation.
  • Rogers, R. (2010). Internet Research: The Question of Method - A Keynote Address from the YouTube and the 2008 Election Cycle in the United States Conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2/3), 241-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681003753438
  • van der Does, J. (2010). Passed over in Silence: On Wittgenstein's Tractatus and its System.
  • Roei, N. (2010). Peace/Fighters: Refusal Movements in Israel. In B. Ö. Fırat, & A. Kuryel (Eds.), Cultural activism: practices, dilemmas, and possibilities (pp. 235-237). (Thamyris intersecting: place, sex, and race; No. 21). Rodopi. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/rodopi/tham/2011/00000021/00000001/art00011
  • Plug, H. J. (2010). Ad-hominem arguments in Dutch and European parliamentary debates: strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context. In C. Ilie (Ed.), European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices (pp. 305-328). (Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture; No. 38). John Benjamins.
  • Plug, H. J. (2010). The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament. Controversia, 7(1), 38-56.
  • Plug, H. J. (2010). Institutional Boundaries on the Evaluation of Argumentation in Legislative Discussions. Legisprudence, 4(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521467.2010.11424701
Page 1784 of 3466