Arguing Against Corporate Claims Visually and Multimodally: The Genre of Subvertisements

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 12-2017
Journal Multimodal Communication
Volume | Issue number 6 | 2
Pages (from-to) 143-157
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR)
Abstract
In this paper, we describe the conditions under which the manipulation of the verbal and the visual elements or of the visual elements alone in the genre of subvertisements can be considered as an act of objecting or rebutting in an implicit argumentative discussion. We thus consider the cognitive and pragmatic aspects of communication while paying serious attention to the interaction of semiotic modes in order to analyse a number of images produced by anti-consumerist groups such as Adbusters. We identify four different ways in which image-text relations or the visuals alone can cue an incongruity between the message of the original ad and the message of the subvertisement in such a way that the latter functions as an objection or rebuttal of the claim advanced by the original advertisement.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2017-0008
Downloads
Arguing Against Corporate Claims Visually (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back