Old tools for the new economy? Counterfactual causation in foreclosure assessment and choice of remedies on data-driven markets

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 07-2025
Journal Journal of Antitrust Enforcement
Volume | Issue number 13 | 1
Pages (from-to) 328-352
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
Under the Digital Markets Act, gatekeeper platforms abide by numerous ex-ante rules, including narrow data-sharing obligations that address data-driven market tipping. Gatekeepers also remain subject to ex-post competition interventions. While interventions under both ex-ante and ex-post (antitrust) mandates are not novel, they must be approached with extra care in data-driven digital markets, where uncertainty and error costs are high. Therefore, we argue that post-DMA competition enforcement against gatekeepers requires rigorous ex-post economic effects analysis at two levels: foreclosure assessment and devising appropriate remedies. Regarding foreclosure assessment, we propose a ‘multiple-counterfactual-causation-test’ for establishing anticompetitive effects, which should ensure a nuanced analysis of the competitive landscape on data-driven digital markets in the post-DMA world. Regarding remedies, a fine-grained, proportionality-driven assessment of the need for ex-post data-related obligations is vital.
Document type Article
Note A correction has been published: Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2025, Page 233, https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae052
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jnae042
Downloads
Old tools for the new economy? (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back