Repression without borders diaspora activism, digital networks, and authoritarian power
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 05-2018 |
| Journal | Political Geography |
| Volume | Issue number | 64 |
| Pages (from-to) | 97-98 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Highlights •An ‘extraterritorial gap’ in political geography and comparative politics impedes analysis of authoritarian power abroad. • Authoritarian rule from the home state continues to be exercised over populations abroad. •It treats nationals abroad as subjects or outlaws; patriots or traitors; clients or brokers, but never as citizens. •Authoritarianism should be studied as a mode of governing people through a set of practices, not as a territorial regime. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | Part of: Intervention: Extraterritorial authoritarian power. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.07.003 |
| Permalink to this page | |