WarTok: Networked Soundscapes of Memetic Warfare
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2023 |
| Book title | AoIR2023 |
| Book subtitle | Research from the Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers |
| Series | Selected Papers in Internet Research |
| Event | The 24th Annual Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Publisher | Association of Internet Researchers |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
This panel investigates the networked soundscapes of memetic warfare on
TikTok, a platform crucial in mediating the ongoing war in Ukraine since
February 2022. Introduced to the public as a unique form of war
programming during the first week of Russia's full-scale military
invasion (Mobilio 2022), WarTok—a portmanteau of ‘TikTok’ and
‘war’—signifies "the war of super-empowered individuals armed only with
smartphones" (Friedmann 2022). Producing headlines such as "TikTok's
Amazing Russian-Ukraine War Videos," (Figure 1) the term necessitates
critical and ethical scrutiny, not only for its sensationalist stance
but also for the collapse of contexts it entails. Integrated into a
platform that thrives on remixing, WarTok seamlessly intertwines
on-the-ground war reporting with war propaganda—an aspect explored
across all panel contributions through the lens of music.
Networked Soundscapes
The choice for sound as the primary step in our exploration not only
derives from the platform’s logic of content creation, it also
acknowledges music’s affective impact and its historical role in
propaganda (Thompson & Biddle 2013). Music on TikTok serves as both
an affective mediator and a highly templatable networker. Recent studies
highlight the templatability of TikTok sounds, offering insights into
content creators' attention-grabbing techniques (Abidin & Kaye
2021), logics of trend dilution (Bainotti et al., 2022), issue-specific
remix cultures (Primig et al. 2023), and infrastructural meme collection
(Rogers & Giorgi 2023).
Aural linkages between templates can intersect with other
platform-native modalities of expression, producing networked
soundscapes. A soundscape, as we approach it by leaning into TikTok’s
logic of indexing “listed” and “original” sounds, foregrounds audio as
the main memetic stratifier, opening up different paths for navigating
content (Geboers et al., forthcoming). Hashtags and sounds, for example,
can turn into a source of mutual amplification or may remain disengaged
even when united through technical means (Pilipets 2023). Feeding into
contested attentional dynamics of digital media (Boler & Davis
2021), propaganda by means of TikTok sharing takes on a new dimension in
a highly contested space, which is said to “raise memes to the level of
infrastructure” (Zulli & Zulli 2021).
Memetic Warfare
Often driven by a cynical hunt for eyeballs, memetic warfare on social
media taps into humor and mockery, inviting playful participation (Divon
2022), channeling disinformation (Bösch 2023), and using agitainment to
captivate publics beyond the explicitly political (Tuters and
Noordenbos forthcoming). In the context of war propaganda, memes become
central agents of partisan bonding through recognizable templates and
inscribed in-group cues (Arkenbout & Scherz 2022). TikTok music
expands the toolbox of crafting memes, opening up new venues of boundary
work and populist instrumentalization (Boichak & Hoskins 2022).
TikTok is renowned for its ability to implant short video earworms,
perceived as stickier than complete songs (Vizcaíno-Verdú & Abidin
2022). Some attribute this phenomenon to the cognitive principle that
human memory retains unfinished tasks more effectively than completed
ones, generating affective tension (Carson 2022). Walter J. Ong’s
“secondary orality”, a concept revived by Venturini (2022), is one way
to address this tension in online spaces where written words often
become spoken words and where evanescence is ingrained into the logic of
engagement. Foregrounding the memetic function of TikTok, the panel
sets out to explore how the ultra-nationalist landscape of Russian
WarTok and the tactics of pro-Ukrainian hijacking intertwine in a
complex ecology of imitation and attention hijacking.
THE SOUND OF DISINFORMATION: TIKTOK, COMPUTATIONAL PROPAGANDA AND THE
INVASION OF UKRAINE
Tom Divon and Marcus Bösch
“ДОБРОГО ВЕЧОРА WHERE ARE YOU FROM”: MEMETIC REVERSAL, CULTURAL
APPROPRIATION, AND SOUND HIJACKING
Daria Delavar-Kasmai
AMBIENT PROPAGANDA: THE DARK REFRAIN OF WARTOK
Marc Tuters and Boris Noordenbos
WHAT IF THEY ATTACK? КАТЮША AND THE COUNTERMOBILIZATION OF SOUND ON
WARTOK
Elena Pilipets and Marloes Geboers
AMBIGUOUS STANCE-TAKING AND OPPOSITIONAL SOUND PUBLICS ON DOUYIN DURING
THE RUSSIA-UKRAINE WAR
Richard Rogers and Xiaoke Zhang
|
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2023i0.13532 |
| Downloads |
Pilipets_Geboers_Divon_Bösch_etal
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
