Comparing hyperprior distributions to estimate variance components for interrater reliability coefficients
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2020 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Quantitative Psychology |
| Book subtitle | 84th Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santiago, Chile, 2019 |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics |
| Event | 84th annual International Meeting of the Psychometric Society |
| Pages (from-to) | 79-93 |
| Publisher | Cham: Springer |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Interrater reliability (IRR) is often estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation of Bayesian hierarchical models to estimate ICCs has several benefits over traditional approaches such as analysis of variance or maximum likelihood estimation. However, estimation of ICCs with small sample sizes and variance parameters close to zero, which are typical conditions in studies for which the IRR should be estimated, remains problematic in this MCMC approach. The estimation of the variance components that are used to estimate ICCs can heavily depend on the hyperprior distributions specified for these random-effect parameters. In this study, we explore the effect of a uniform and half-t hyperprior distribution on bias, coverage, and efficiency of the random-effect parameters and ICCs. The results indicated that a half-t distribution outperforms a uniform distribution but that slightly increasing the number of raters in a study is more influential than the choice of hyperprior distributions. We discuss implications and directions for future research.
|
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43469-4_7 |
| Downloads |
Hove2020_Chapter_ComparingHyperpriorDistributio
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
