Reply to Choi-Kain and colleagues’: Correspondence to Setkowski and colleagues on best psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 11-02-2025
Journal Psychological Medicine
Article number e41
Volume | Issue number 55
Number of pages 2
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract
We appreciate the judicious comments of Choi-Kain et al. (2023) on our network meta-analysis (NMA) (Setkowski et al., 2023). The authors identified an important challenge within the field, namely that psychological treatments are sometimes labeled differently compared to what they provide. Not all studies included in our NMA provide a clear description of their intervention- and control conditions (e.g., treatment-as-usual). As described in Supplemental Table S2 (Setkowski et al., 2023), some of the included studies provided little to no information about their control conditions, whereas others described them in great detail. However, this is an issue (N)MAs in general face. We therefore encourage the field to be more detailed about the intervention- and control conditions they examine.
Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Note Reply to: L.W. Choi-Kain, I. Weinberg, B. Ren (2023) Correspondence to Setkowski and colleagues on Best psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder, In: Psychological Medicine, Vol. 53 , Iss. 15, pp. 7469-7470.
Language English
Related publication Which psychotherapy is most effective and acceptable in the treatment of adults with a (sub)clinical borderline personality disorder?
Published at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724002708
Downloads
Reply to Choi-Kain and colleagues’ (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back