A Framework of Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypotheses

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 03-2021
Host editors
  • M. Bläser
  • B. Monmege
Book title 38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
Book subtitle STACS 2021, March 16–19, 2021, Saarbrücken, Germany (Virtual Conference)
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9783959771801
Series Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
Event 38th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
Article number 19
Number of pages 19
Publisher Saarbrücken/Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Organisations
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Informatics Institute (IVI)
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Korteweg-de Vries Institute for Mathematics (KdVI)
  • Interfacultary Research - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Abstract
The strong exponential-time hypothesis (SETH) is a commonly used conjecture in the field of complexity theory. It essentially states that determining whether a CNF formula is satisfiable can not be done faster than exhaustive search over all possible assignments. This hypothesis and its variants gave rise to a fruitful field of research, fine-grained complexity, obtaining (mostly tight) lower bounds for many problems in P whose unconditional lower bounds are very likely beyond current techniques. In this work, we introduce an extensive framework of Quantum Strong Exponential-Time Hypotheses, as quantum analogues to what SETH is for classical computation. Using the QSETH framework, we are able to translate quantum query lower bounds on black-box problems to conditional quantum time lower bounds for many problems in P. As an example, we provide a conditional quantum time lower bound of Ω(n^1.5) for the Longest Common Subsequence and Edit Distance problems. We also show that the n^2 SETH-based lower bound for a recent scheme for Proofs of Useful Work carries over to the quantum setting using our framework, maintaining a quadratic gap between verifier and prover. Lastly, we show that the assumptions in our framework can not be simplified further with relativizing proof techniques, as they are false in relativized worlds.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2021.19
Published at https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.05686
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back