Weiss en de toekomst van de Europese democratie

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2021
Journal TvCR: tijdschrift voor constitutioneel recht
Article number 9
Volume | Issue number 12 | 2
Pages (from-to) 97-117
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
Abstract
This article analyzes the Weiss ruling in a broader constitutional perspective. In section 2, I first outline how the Weiss ruling relates to Karlsruhe's case law on the EU. In section 3, I then zoom in on the legal issue in the Weiss case and compare the German court's ruling with that of the ECJ. In section 4, I discuss whether the German judges were right to raise a democratic deficit in the ECB's actions and whether the ruling helps to reduce that deficit. My answer in short is: yes and no. Karlsruhe points to a democratic deficit, but the ruling in Weiss cannot fix that structural problem. In section 5, I turn to the further implications of the ruling for the EU. There I show how fundamental questions about the future of the Union have increasingly fallen into the hands of the Karlsruhe judges. In Section 6, I explain why the Karlsruhe case law is ultimately itself problematic from a democratic point of view, even though the German Constitutional Court's jurisprudence relies precisely on the constitutional principle of democracy. Section 7 concludes with a conclusion.
Document type Article
Language Dutch
Published at https://doi.org/10.5553/TvCR/187966642021012002002
Published at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3815611 http://deeplinking.kluwer.nl/?param=00D5BA06&cpid=WKNL-LTR-Nav2
Downloads
SSRN-id3815611 (Submitted manuscript)
Permalink to this page
Back